West Suffolk Local Plan (Regulation 18) Preferred Options
Part Three: Site Allocations
Appendix B - omission sites
Sites included in the issues and options consultation stage, with reasons for omission from the preferred options consultation document.
8.1. As a result of comments received at the issues and options consultation stage and further evidence base work, many sites have now been discounted and are not proposed for allocation in this plan.
8.2. These sites are now referred to as ‘omission sites’ and are set out in the table below, alongside a brief justification setting out why they haven’t been selected as a preferred allocation.
8.3. The reasons for omission fall broadly into the following categories:
- Environmental constraints (for example Breckland Special Protection Area (SPA), special areas of conservation (SAC), county wildlife site (CWS), flood zone).
- The site is not available and/or deliverable (either confirmed by the landowner or is in multiple ownership).
- The site is within the settlement boundary and could come forward as windfall development.
- The site has a planning approval and development has commenced or is completed.
- Other available sites are more suitable and sustainable options.
8.4. Abbreviations (such as SPA and SAC) are set out in the glossary. If you would like to comment on any of the omission sites, please refer to the site reference number and settlement name when doing so.
Please add your comments to the omissions sites section here, ensuring you state which paragraph or site your comments relate to.
Residential omissions sites (Bardwell to Clare inclusive)
Strategic housing and economic land availability assessment (SHELAA) reference consulted at issues and options (ending in (A) shows amended boundary at issues and options) | 2021 SHELAA reference (new sites submitted at issues and options) | Vision or site allocations local plan allocation reference | Settlement | Location | Reason for omission |
WS002 | Bardwell | Hillside, Knox Lane | Landscape impact – site is highly visible and forms a significant feature within the surrounding landscape.
| ||
WS218 | Bardwell | Street Farm, Low Street | The site and/or development would be an inappropriate form of back land development. | ||
WS679(A) | Barnham | St Martin's Meadow | Site within Breckland special protection area (SPA) and/or associated buffer | ||
WS1000 | Barnham | RAF training camp | Site within Breckland special protection area (SPA) and/or associated buffer | ||
WS1001 | Barnham | St Martin's Lane | Site within Breckland special protection area (SPA) and/or associated buffer | ||
WS1003 | Barnham | north of The Street and Barnham Road | Site within Breckland special protection area (SPA) and/or associated buffer | ||
WS004 | Barningham | Option A, land at Bardwell Road | Landscape impact – site is highly visible on the edge of the settlement. An alternative site is considered to be a more suitable option. | ||
WS006 | Barningham | Option C, land at Bardwell Road | Landscape impact – site is highly visible and poorly relates to the existing settlement boundary. An alternative site is considered to be a more suitable and sustainable option. | ||
RV15a | Barningham | land at Hopton Road | The site has a local plan allocation, planning approval and development is complete. | ||
WS003 | Barningham | land off Sandy Lane | Unsustainable location – site poorly relates to the existing defensible settlement boundary. Landscape impact, areas of high grade agricultural land and flooding. An alternative site is considered to be a more suitable and sustainable option. | ||
WS007 | Barningham | land to north of Field Cottage, Bardwell Road | Highways impact – site adjoins single lane and no footpath. Area of high grade agricultural land. An alternative site is considered to be a more suitable and sustainable option. | ||
WS1005 | Barrow | Denham Road (west of Barrow) | Potential coalescence issues with Denham. | ||
WS010(A) | Barrow | land at Barrow Hill | Landscape – proximity to ancient woodland. An alternative site is considered to be a more suitable and sustainable option. | ||
RV10a | Barrow | land at The Green | The site has a local plan allocation, planning approval and development is complete. | ||
WS014 | RV10b | Barrow | Land east of Barrow Hill, Barrow | The site has a local plan allocation, a planning approval and development has commenced. | |
WS1079 | Barrow | land north of Mill Lane | Unsustainable location – site poorly relates to the existing settlement boundary. Landscape impact – site is highly visible and forms a significant feature within the surrounding landscape. | ||
WS228(A) | Barrow | land off Barrow Hill | An alternative site is considered to be a more suitable and sustainable option. | ||
WS012a | WS1078 (part of WS012) | Barrow | land off Barrow Hill | Potential coalescence issues with Denham. | |
WS009 | Barrow | land to rear of 2 Stoney Lane | Unsustainable location – site poorly relates to the existing settlement boundary. | ||
WS013 | Barrow | land to the west of Mill Lane (resubmitted as land rear of Layes Road and Mill Lane) | Potential impacts on scheduled ancient monument to the north of the site.
| ||
RV10c | Barrow | land west of Barrow Hill | The site has a local plan allocation, planning approval and development is complete. | ||
WS015 | Barton Mills | land at Grange Farm Cottages | Unsustainable location – site poorly relates to the existing settlement boundary. An alternative site is considered to be a more suitable and sustainable option. | ||
WS016 | Barton Mills | land to the north of Grange Lane | Unsustainable location – site poorly relates to the existing settlement boundary. The site and/or development would be an inappropriate form of back land development. | ||
WS017 | Barton Mills | land to the west of Church Lane | Landscape impact – site is highly visible and forms a prominent feature within the surrounding landscape. | ||
WS018 | Barton Mills | land to rear of 21 Mildenhall Road | Unsustainable location – site poorly relates to the existing settlement boundary. The site and/or development would be an inappropriate form of back land development. | ||
WS204 | Barton Mills | land south of Worlington Road and adjacent to former dairy sites | The site has a planning approval and development is complete. | ||
WS1006 | Barton Mills | land north of Newmarket Road | Site within Breckland special protection area and/or associated buffer | ||
WS1007 | Barton Mills | land north of Mildenhall Road | Part of the site in flood zone 2 and/or 3. Site within Breckland Special Protection Area and/or associated buffer. | ||
WS1008 | Barton Mills | Newmarket Road | Site within Breckland Special Protection Area and/or associated buffer. | ||
WS026 | SA11b | Beck Row | land adjacent to and south of caravan park on Aspal Lane | The site has a local plan allocation, planning approval and development is complete. | |
WS027 | SA11d | Beck Row | land adjacent to Beck Lodge Farm | The site has a local plan allocation, planning approval and development is complete. | |
SA11c | Beck Row | land east of Aspal Lane | The site has a local plan allocation, planning approval and development is complete. | ||
WS019 | Beck Row | site at Stock Corner Farm | The site has a planning approval and development has commenced. | ||
WS020(A) | Beck Row | site at Stock Corner Farm | Given the proximity and relationship between Beck Row and Mildenhall, growth in Beck Row needs to be considered in conjunction with growth in Mildenhall. Beck Row has seen significant windfall growth in recent years and an existing allocation and one other site are considered to be more suitable and sustainable options to meet housing needs in the plan period. | ||
WS021 | Beck Row | land east of Skeltons Drove | Given the proximity and relationship between Beck Row and Mildenhall, growth in Beck Row needs to be considered in conjunction with growth in Mildenhall. Beck Row has seen significant windfall growth in recent years and an existing allocation and one other site are considered to be more suitable and sustainable options to meet housing needs in the plan period. | ||
WS022 | Beck Row | land between Aspal Lane and Wildmere Lane | Given the proximity and relationship between Beck Row and Mildenhall, growth in Beck Row needs to be considered in conjunction with growth in Mildenhall. Beck Row has seen significant windfall growth in recent years and an existing allocation and one other site are considered to be more suitable and sustainable options to meet housing needs in the plan period. | ||
WS028 | Beck Row | Aspal Nursery, Aspal Lane | Given the proximity and relationship between Beck Row and Mildenhall, growth in Beck Row needs to be considered in conjunction with growth in Mildenhall. Beck Row has seen significant windfall growth in recent years and an existing allocation and one other site are considered to be more suitable and sustainable options to meet housing needs in the plan period. | ||
WS029 | Beck Row | land at junction of Aspal Lane and St John's Street | Given the proximity and relationship between Beck Row and Mildenhall, growth in Beck Row needs to be considered in conjunction with growth in Mildenhall. Beck Row has seen significant windfall growth in recent years and an existing allocation and one other site are considered to be more suitable and sustainable options to meet housing needs in the plan period. | ||
WS031 | Beck Row | land at corner or Wilde Street and Aspal Lane | The site has a planning approval and development has commenced. | ||
WS654 | Beck Row | land north of Holmsey Green | Given the proximity and relationship between Beck Row and Mildenhall, growth in Beck Row needs to be considered in conjunction with growth in Mildenhall. Beck Row has seen significant windfall growth in recent years and an existing allocation and one other site are considered to be more suitable and sustainable options to meet housing needs in the plan period. | ||
WS655(A) | Beck Row | land south of Wilde Street | Given the proximity and relationship between Beck Row and Mildenhall, growth in Beck Row needs to be considered in conjunction with growth in Mildenhall. Beck Row has seen significant windfall growth in recent years and an existing allocation and one other site are considered to be more suitable and sustainable options to meet housing needs in the plan period. | ||
WS1009 | Beck Row | site adjacent Rolfe's Coal Yard | Site has not been confirmed as available and/or deliverable. | ||
WS1082 | Beck Row | land adjacent Moss Edge Farm | Beck Row is located five kilometres from Mildenhall. Given the proximity and relationship between the settlements, growth in Beck Row needs to be considered in conjunction with growth in Mildenhall. Beck Row has seen significant windfall growth under the existing local plan. Other sites are considered to be more suitable and sustainable options to meet housing needs in the plan period. | ||
WS249(A) | Brandon | west of Brandon | Site within Breckland Special Protection Area | ||
WS261(A) | Brandon | Brandon Cottage, Rattlers Road | Site within Breckland Special Protection Area | ||
WS032 | SA2b | Brandon | Land off Gas House Lane | The site is a current local plan allocation and there is an outline planning approval on the site for nine dwellings which is below the minimum threshold for a site allocation. The site is within the settlement boundary and could come forward as windfall development. | |
WS050 | BV11 | Bury St Edmunds | land at Ram Meadow | The site is within the settlement boundary and could come forward as windfall development. | |
WS052 | BV10a | Bury St Edmunds | Dobbies Garden Centre | Site has not been confirmed as available and/or deliverable. The site is within the settlement boundary and could come forward as windfall development. | |
WS053 | BV10b | Bury St Edmunds | land at Jacqueline Close | Site has not been confirmed as available and/or deliverable. The site is within the settlement boundary and could come forward as windfall development. | |
WS054 | BV10c | Bury St Edmunds | Hospital site, Hospital Road | Site has not been confirmed as available and/or deliverable. The site is within the settlement boundary and could come forward as windfall development. | |
BV10d | Bury St Edmunds | Shire Hall | The site has a local plan allocation, planning approval and development is complete. | ||
BV10f | Bury St Edmunds | land at School Yard | The site has a local plan allocation, planning approval and development is complete. | ||
BV10g | Bury St Edmunds | Almoners Barn, Cullum Road | The site has a local plan allocation, planning approval and development is complete. | ||
WS035 | Bury St Edmunds | land at Hollow Road Farm, Barton Hill | The site is considered an unsustainable location with limited access to community services and facilities. Other sites are considered to be more suitable and sustainable options | ||
WS042 | Bury St Edmunds | land to south of Westley Road and east of Westley Lane | Potential coalescence issues with Horringer and Ickworth Park. Landscape impact – visual prominence of site would likely impact the visual setting of Ickworth park. Highways impact – poor connectivity the settlement. | ||
WS045 | Bury St Edmunds | St Louis Middle School | Within the settlement boundary. Planning approval on part of site and the remainder could come forward as windfall development. | ||
WS046 | Bury St Edmunds | Westley Road, Westley | Site adjacent to existing strategic allocation and land reserved for relief road, the delivery of which should not be comprised. Other sites are considered to be more suitable and sustainable options. | ||
WS214 | Bury St Edmunds | Tayfen Road | The site has a planning approval and development is nearing completion. | ||
WS268(A) | Bury St Edmunds | land west of Bury St Edmunds | Unsustainable location – site poorly relates to the existing settlement boundary | ||
WS276 | Bury St Edmunds | land off Eastgate Street, Barn Lane | The site is within the settlement boundary and could come forward as windfall development. | ||
WS327(A) | Bury St Edmunds | made up of WS573, WS543, WS330 | There was an insufficient local housing need to warrant a new settlement. ‘Locking-in’ a new settlement as the means for meeting long-term housing need risks unduly foreclosing other strategy options. Other sites adjacent to Bury St Edmunds have been identified as more suitable and sustainable options. The site falls partly within the Great Barton Neighbourhood Plan area. The plan was made on 22 June 2021 and allocates a site to meet the local housing need in the plan period. | ||
WS543 | Bury St Edmunds | land north of Barton Hill and west of A134 | The site is considered an unsustainable location with limited access to community services and facilities. Other sites are considered to be more suitable and sustainable options | ||
WS548 | Bury St Edmunds | Sentinel Works, Northgate Avenue | The site is below the minimum threshold for a proposed site allocation.
| ||
WS552 | Bury St Edmunds | Rathkeltair Lodge, Barton Hill | The site is considered an unsustainable location with limited access to community services and facilities. Other sites are considered to be more suitable and sustainable options | ||
WS553 | Bury St Edmunds | Thingoe Hill | The site is within the settlement boundary and could come forward as windfall development. | ||
WS656 | Bury St Edmunds | Norfolk Road | The site is below the minimum threshold for a proposed site allocation.
| ||
Bury St Edmunds | Tayfen Road (EMG) | The site has planning approval and development is complete. | |||
WS036 | Bury St Edmunds | Cornwallis Court | The site is below the minimum threshold for a proposed site allocation. | ||
WS056 | BV10h | Bury St Edmunds | Garages and Bus Depot, Cotton Lane, Bury St Edmunds | Site has not been confirmed as available and/or deliverable. | |
WS055 | BV10e | Bury St Edmunds | Weymed Site, Bury St Edmunds | The site has a local plan allocation, a planning approval and development has commenced. | |
WS049 | BV8 | Bury St Edmunds | Station Hill | The site has a local plan allocation, a planning approval and development is nearing completion. | |
WS273 | BV9 | Bury St Edmunds | Land off Tayfen Road | The site has a local plan allocation, a planning approval and development has commenced. | |
WS1012 | Bury St Edmunds | land north-east of Bury St Edmunds | Potential coalescence issues with Great Barton. Landscape impact – visual prominence would impact the entrance to Bury St Edmunds. Highways impact and poor connectivity to services and facilities. The site falls within the Great Barton Neighbourhood Plan area. The plan was made on 22 June 2021 and allocates a site to meet the local housing need in the plan period. | ||
WS1013 | Bury St Edmunds | land to the south of Hencote Lane | Landscape impact – site is visually prominent and includes high biodiversity habitats. Access is constrained. | ||
WS057 | Cavendish | Blacklands field, part of Scotts Farm | The site is considered an unsustainable location – poor access. The site and/or development would be an inappropriate form of back land development. | ||
WS060 | Chedburgh | land adjacent to Queens Lane | Other sites are considered to be more suitable and sustainable options. Land rises to the east of Queen’s Lane and any development would be visible in the landscape. | ||
WS061 | Chedburgh | Oak Tree Farm, land north of Bury Road | Other sites are considered to be more suitable and sustainable options. Lack of sustainable connectivity to the rest of the village. | ||
WS062 | Chedburgh | land south-west of Chevington Road | Other sites are considered to be more suitable and sustainable options. Would lead to inappropriate ribbon development along Chevington Road. | ||
WS064 | Chedburgh | land west of RV17a Queens Lane, Chedburgh (also known as land north of Majors Close) | Other sites are considered to be more suitable and sustainable options. Potential access issues and would erode landscape character of the village core. | ||
WS554 | Chedburgh | land to the west of Elizabeth Drive | The site is considered an unsustainable location – poorly relates to the existing settlement boundary and services and facilities. | ||
WS555 | Chedburgh | land to the north of Elizabeth Drive | The site is considered an unsustainable location – poorly relates to the existing settlement boundary and services and facilities. | ||
WS556 | Chedburgh | land to the north of Elizabeth Drive | The site is considered an unsustainable location – poorly relates to the existing settlement boundary and services and facilities. | ||
WS1015 | Chevington | Golden Acres, Tan Office Green | Chevington settlement is designated as a type B villages in our settlement hierarchy. Type B villages are designated as villages which have only a limited range of services and facilities. In type B villages only small-scale infill development of five homes or less within the designated housing settlement boundary will be permitted. Therefore, no sites are being allocated in this area. | ||
RV11a | Clare | land east of The Granary | The site has a local plan allocation, planning approval and development is complete. | ||
WS072 | Clare | Townsend Nurseries | The site is within the settlement boundary and could come forward as windfall development. | ||
WS073 | Clare | Land at Stoke Road | Other sites are considered to be more suitable and sustainable options. Landscape impact – Clare is constrained by the sensitivity of the surrounding landscape, as set out in the West Suffolk landscape character assessment (May 2022). This study identifies the settlement as lying within the Chilton Street Farmlands character area, where only small-scale built development is appropriate within the intimate landscape of the valley villages and stream margins. | ||
WS074 | Clare | land north of Cavendish Road | The site is considered an unsustainable location – poorly relates to the existing settlement boundary and services and facilities. | ||
WS075 | Clare | land to the south-east of Chilton Street Business Park, (resubmitted as land at Snow Hill) | The site is considered an unsustainable location – poorly relates to the existing settlement boundary and services and facilities. Landscape impact – site is visually prominent. |
Residential omission sites (Exning to Hundon inclusive)
Strategic housing and economic land availability assessment (SHELAA) reference consulted at issues and options (ending in (A) shows amended boundary at issues and options) | 2021 SHELAA reference (new sites submitted at issues and options) | Vision or site allocations local plan allocation reference | Settlement | Location | Reason for omission |
WS080(A) | Exning | land east of Heath Road | The site is considered an unsustainable location – proximity to A14 and services and facilities in the settlement. Landscape buffer and/or important gap. | ||
WS661(A) | Exning | Marsh Stables | Site has not been confirmed as available and/or deliverable and existing horse racing industry use in landscape buffer and/or important gap. | ||
WS663(A) | Exning | land to the rear of 2 York Villas, North End | The site is considered an unsustainable location – poor access. The site and/or development would be an inappropriate form of back land development. | ||
WS1017 | Exning | land south of Ducks Lane | Majority of the site in flood zone 2 and/or 3. The site is considered an unsustainable location – proximity to A14. | ||
WS1018 | Flempton | Flempton House, Bury Road | The site is considered an unsustainable location – small rural settlement with few or no services. Settlement has no boundary, and no sites will be allocated through the local plan. | ||
WS081 | Fornham St Martin | land at The Old Granary (also known as land at School Lane | Landscape impact – loss of important landscape gap which forms a distinctive element between the two defined settlement boundaries. | ||
WS216 | Fornham St Martin | land east of Culford Road | Landscape impact – visually prominent site which forms entrance and/or exit to settlement. | ||
WS570 | Fornham St Martin | land west of Thetford Road | Site provides an important buffer between the village and Bury St Edmunds. An alternative site is considered to be a more suitable and sustainable option. | ||
WS1019 | Fornham St Martin | land south of The Drift | The site and/or development would be an inappropriate form of backland development. | ||
WS1020 | Fornham St Martin | land east of The Street | The site is considered an unsustainable location – poor access and requires development of site to front to come forward. | ||
WS1021 | Fornham St Martin | land at Tollbridge House, Bury Road | Majority of site within flood zone 2 or 3. | ||
WS083 | Freckenham | land east of North Street | Landscape impact – loss of important landscape gap which forms a distinctive element to settlements character. | ||
WS084 | Freckenham | land adjacent to Feckenham House, Mildenhall Road | Potential impact on character and/or appearance of conservation area – trees on site form important feature. | ||
WS683 | Freckenham | land at Fordham Road | Landscape impact – loss of important landscape gap which forms a distinctive element between the two defined settlement boundaries. | ||
WS1022 | Freckenham | land at Mildenhall Road | The site is considered an unsustainable location – poorly relates to the existing settlement boundary and services and facilities. | ||
WS1023 | Freckenham | Millfield, Fordham Road | The site and/or development would be an inappropriate form of back land development. | ||
WS1024 | Gazeley | land to the north of Moulton Road | Gazeley settlement is designated as a type B village in the settlement hierarchy and has only a limited range of services and facilities. In type B villages there are no site allocations and only small-scale infill development of five homes or less within the designated housing settlement boundary will be permitted. | ||
WS1077 | Gazeley | Mill Meadow, Pupil Referral Unit, Mill Lane | Gazeley settlement is designated as a type B village in the settlement hierarchy and has only a limited range of services and facilities. In type B villages there are no site allocations and only small-scale infill development of five homes or less within the designated housing settlement boundary will be permitted. | ||
WS094 | RV19a | Great and Little Thurlow | Goldings Farm, Great Thurlow | The site is below the minimum threshold for a proposed site allocation. Site has not been confirmed as available and/or deliverable. | |
WS088 | Great Barton | Site B land south of Mill Road | The Great Barton Neighbourhood Plan was 'made' on 22 June 2021. The plan allocates a site to meet the local housing need in the plan period. | ||
WS089 | Great Barton | Site A land north of Mill Road | The Great Barton Neighbourhood Plan was 'made' on 22 June 2021. The plan allocates a site to meet the local housing need in the plan period. | ||
WS091 | Great Barton | land adjacent to Great Barton Free Church, Mill Lane | The Great Barton Neighbourhood Plan was 'made' on 22 June 2021. The plan allocates a site to meet the local housing need in the plan period. | ||
WS573 | Great Barton | land to west of Livermere Road | The Great Barton Neighbourhood Plan was 'made' on 22 June 2021. The plan allocates a site to meet the local housing need in the plan period. | ||
WS1025 | Great Barton | land at White Rose Cottage, Nacton Lane | The site is below the minimum threshold for a proposed site allocation. The Great Barton Neighbourhood Plan was 'made' on 22 June 2021. The plan allocates a site to meet the local housing need in the plan period. | ||
WS1026 | Great Barton | land adjoining Crossways, Brand Road | The site is considered an unsustainable location – detached from settlement of Great Barton and poor connectivity. The Great Barton Neighbourhood Plan was 'made' on 22 June 2021. The plan allocates a site to meet the local housing need in the plan period. | ||
WS1027 | Great Livermere | The Lodge | The site is considered an unsustainable location – small rural settlement with few or no services. Settlement has no boundary, and no sites will be allocated through the local plan. | ||
WS095 | RV20a | Great Whelnetham | Erskine Lodge | The site has a local plan allocation, a planning approval and development is nearing completion. | |
RV20b | Great Whelnetham | land at Tutelina Rise | The site has a local plan allocation, planning approval and development is complete. | ||
WS097 | Haverhill | land south of Haverhill | The site is cross boundary. Landscape impacts – result in urban sprawl outside natural barrier or settlement and visual prominence due to scale of site. Two strategic sites already have planning permission (north-east and north-west Haverhill) and are planned to deliver a significant number of new homes in Haverhill to meet local needs over the plan period. This site has been omitted, as along with these existing strategic commitments to the north, it could be difficult to deliver over the same period due to market absorption issues. Other sites adjacent to Haverhill have been identified as more suitable and sustainable options to meet the housing need. | ||
WS096 | HV10 | Haverhill | Hanchett End | The site is a former employment local plan allocation, with a recently allowed appeal for residential development. Site likely to come forward during current local plan period. | |
WS099 | HV5c | Haverhill | Former Castle Hill Middle School, Haverhill | The site has a local plan allocation, a planning approval and development has commenced. | |
WS100 | HV6c | Haverhill | Former Westfield Primary School | The site has a local plan allocation, a planning approval and development has commenced. | |
WS102 | HV5a | Haverhill | Land south of Chapelwent Road, Haverhill | The site has a local plan allocation, a planning approval and development is nearing completion. | |
WS103 | HV6a | Haverhill | Former gasworks, Withersfield Road | Site has not been confirmed as available and/or deliverable. The site is within the settlement boundary and could come forward as windfall development. | |
WS668 | HV7e | Haverhill | Brook Service Road/Car Park | Site has not been confirmed as available and/or deliverable. The site is within the settlement boundary and could come forward as windfall development. | |
WS684 | HV7d | Haverhill | Cleales/Town Hall Car Park | Site has not been confirmed as available and/or deliverable. The site is within the settlement boundary and could come forward as windfall development. | |
WS685 | HV7c | Haverhill | Rear of Argos/Post office | Site has not been confirmed as available and/or deliverable. The site is within the settlement boundary and could come forward as windfall development. | |
HV5b | Haverhill | land on corner of Millfields Way and Kestrel Road | The site has a local plan allocation, planning approval and development is complete. | ||
HV6b | Haverhill | Hamlet Croft | The site has a local plan allocation, planning approval and development is complete. | ||
WS1028 | Haverhill | Hales Barn | Other sites are considered to be more suitable and sustainable options. Rising land leads to visual prominence, and the adjacent public right of way also serves to suggest landscape sensitivity. | ||
WS1029 | Haverhill | Hanchett Hall Farm | Landscape impact. Would result in urban sprawl outside natural barrier of settlement and be visually prominent. | ||
WS1032 | Hepworth | former Duke of Marlborough | Hepworth settlement is designated as a type B village in the settlement hierarchy and has only limited range of services and facilities. In type B villages there are no site allocations and only small-scale infill development of five homes or less within the designated housing settlement boundary will be permitted. | ||
WS1033 | Hepworth | land south of Hepworth Road | Hepworth settlement is designated as a type B village in the settlement hierarchy and has only limited range of services and facilities. In type B villages there are no site allocations and only small-scale infill development of five homes or less within the designated housing settlement boundary will be permitted. | ||
WS1034 | Hepworth | land between Old School House and Old Rectory | Hepworth settlement is designated as a type B village in the settlement hierarchy and has only limited range of services and facilities. In type B villages there are no site allocations and only small-scale infill development of five homes or less within the designated housing settlement boundary will be permitted. | ||
WS107(A) | Higham | land north of post office | The site is considered an unsustainable location – small rural settlement with few or no services. Settlement has no boundary, and no sites will be allocated through the local plan. | ||
WS1037 | Holywell Row | Eriswell Road | Holywell Row settlement is designated as a type B village in the settlement hierarchy and has only a limited range of services and facilities. In Type B villages there are no site allocations and only small-scale infill development of five homes or less within the designated housing settlement boundary will be permitted. | ||
WS111 | Horringer | land north-east of Horringer | Potential impact on character and/or appearance of conservation area. The site is considered an unsustainable location – poor relationship with settlement and services and facilities of Horringer. Landscape impact – site within defined special landscape area and visual prominence given scale of site. | ||
WS112 | Horringer | land north-west of Horringer | Potential impact on character and/or appearance of conservation area and Ickworth Park. The site is considered an unsustainable location – poor relationship with settlement and services and facilities of Horringer. Landscape impact – site within defined special landscape area and visual prominence given scale of site. | ||
WS593 | Horringer | land off Manor Road | The site and/or development would be an inappropriate form of back land development. Under the minimum dwelling threshold for allocation. | ||
WS594 | Horringer | land south-east of Hornbean Drive | Landscape impact – site within defined special landscape area and visual prominence given scale of site. Poor access. | ||
WS595 | Horringer | The corner of Westley Lane and A143 | Potential impact on character and/or appearance of conservation area. Landscape impact – site within defined special landscape area and visual prominence given scale of site. Would extend well defined entrance to the village. | ||
WS1039 | Horringer | land east of The Street | Landscape impact – site within defined special landscape area and visual prominence given scale of site. Poor access. | ||
WS115 | Hundon | Land east of Mill Road | Landscape impact – Hundon is constrained by the sensitivity of the surrounding landscape, as set out in the West Suffolk Landscape Character Assessment (May 2022). This study identifies the settlement as lying within the Chilton Street Farmlands character area, where only small-scale built development is appropriate within the intimate landscape of the valley villages and stream margins. | ||
WS116 | Hundon | land between Church Street and Lower Street | Part of the site in flood zone 2 and/or 3. Other sites are considered to be more suitable – result in loss of allotments | ||
WS117 | Hundon | land at Mill Lane | Other sites are considered to be more suitable – result in loss of open space and/or recreational ground. | ||
WS200 | Hundon | Land at Mizon Close | Landscape impact – Hundon is constrained by the sensitivity of the surrounding landscape, as set out in the West Suffolk Landscape Character Assessment (May 2022). This study identifies the settlement as lying within the Chilton Street Farmlands character area, where only small-scale built development is appropriate within the intimate landscape of the valley villages and stream margins. | ||
WS1040 | Hundon | site at Babel Green | Majority of the site in flood zone 2 and/or 3. The site and/or development would be an inappropriate form of back land development. | ||
WS1041 | Hundon | land to east of Hall Road | The site is considered an unsustainable location – poor relationship with settlement and services and facilities of Hundon. |
Residential sites (Icklingham to Worlington inclusive)
Strategic housing and economic land availability assessment (SHELAA) reference consulted at issues and options (ending in (A) shows amended boundary at issues and options) | 2021 SHELAA reference (new sites submitted at issues and options) | Vision or site allocations local plan allocation reference | Settlement | Location | Reason for omission |
WS370(A) | Icklingham | part of Roan Hall | Icklingham settlement is designated as a type B village in the settlement hierarchy and has only a limited range of services and facilities. In type B villages there are no site allocations and only small-scale infill development of five homes or less within the designated housing settlement boundary will be permitted. | ||
WS1042 | Icklingham | Church Farm and allotment site | Icklingham settlement is designated as a type B village in the settlement hierarchy and has only a limited range of services and facilities. In type B villages there are no site allocations and only small-scale infill development of five homes or less within the designated housing settlement boundary will be permitted. | ||
WS118 | Ingham | land north of Culford Road | Landscape impact – site is highly visible. Development of part of site adjacent to the settlement boundary would be inappropriate backland development. | ||
RV22a | Ingham | land at The Gables | The site has a local plan allocation, planning approval and development is complete. | ||
WS120 | Ingham | land south of Culford Road | Landscape impact – site is highly visible and forms the edge of the settlement. Land provides buffer to area of employment to the south. | ||
WS1043 | Ingham | land west of A134 Culford Heath | The site is considered an unsustainable location – detached from settlement of Ingham and poor connectivity. | ||
RV12a | Ixworth | Reeves Farm, Stow Road | The site has a local plan allocation, planning approval and development is complete. | ||
RV13a | Kedington | Stourmead complex | The site has a local plan allocation, planning approval and development is complete. | ||
WS124 | Kedington | land south of Hundon Road | Landscape impact – visual prominence of site and would require removal of existing landscape features. Other sites are considered to be more suitable and sustainable options. | ||
WS201 | SA13b | Kentford | Meddler Stud Bury Road | The site has a local plan allocation, a planning approval and development is nearing completion. | |
WS127 | Kentford | Kentford Lodge, Herringswell Road | The site has a planning approval and development is nearing completion. | ||
WS128 | SA13a | Kentford | land to the Rear of The Kentford | The site has a local plan allocation, planning approval and development is complete. | |
WS1045 | Kentford | Icknield Way | Site within Breckland Special Protection Area buffer. The site is considered an unsustainable location – proximity to A14, potential noise issues. Potential for landscape impacts. | ||
WS1046 | Kentford | Bury Road | Site has not been confirmed as available and/or deliverable. | ||
WS131 | Lakenheath | 35 Station Road | Site within Breckland Special Protection Area and/or associated buffer. The site is within the settlement boundary and could come forward as windfall development. | ||
WS400(A) | Lakenheath | land off Covey Way and The Firs | Site within Breckland Special Protection Area and/or associated buffer. | ||
WS1047 | Little Saxham | Lodge Farm | The site is considered an unsustainable location – small rural settlement with few or no services. Settlement has no boundary, and no sites will be allocated through the local plan. | ||
WS1048 | Little Wratting | land to the rear of Medgower | The site is considered an unsustainable location – small rural settlement with few or no services. Settlement has no boundary, and no sites will be allocated through the local plan. | ||
WS420 | Mildenhall | land off West Row Road | Other sites are considered to be more suitable and sustainable options. Land is not currently required in this location to meet the needs of the strategic site immediately to the south and east. | ||
WS142 | SA5a | Mildenhall | land at 54 Kingsway | Site has not been confirmed as available and/or deliverable. The site is within the settlement boundary and could come forward as windfall development. | |
WS1050 | Mildenhall | 97 Kingsway | Site has not been confirmed as available and/or deliverable. The site is within the settlement boundary and could come forward as windfall development. | ||
WS144 | Moulton | land off Newmarket Road | Landscape impact – an alternative site is considered to be a more suitable and sustainable option. | ||
WS1052 | Moulton | land east of Dalham Road | An alternative site is considered to be a more suitable and sustainable option. | ||
WS147 | SA6a | Newmarket | Southern portion of Brickfield Stud, Exning Road | The site has a local plan allocation, planning approval and development has commenced. | |
WS148 | SA6c | Newmarket | land at Phillips Close and grassland off Leaders Way and Sefton Way | The site has a local plan allocation but currently confirmed as unavailable and/or deliverable. The site is within the settlement boundary and could come forward as windfall development. | |
WS613 | Newmarket | Scaltback School site | The site is not available. | ||
SA6e | Newmarket | land adjacent to Jim Joel Court | The site has a local plan allocation, planning approval and development is complete. | ||
SA6f | Newmarket | 146a High Street | The site has a local plan allocation, planning approval and development is complete. | ||
WS1053 | Newmarket | Stud lodge, Exning Road | Other sites are considered to be more suitable and sustainable options. Currently land within horse racing use and there are sites available in non-horse related uses that are preferrable. | ||
WS1054 | Newmarket | Rowley Drive | Horse racing industry use – former Holland House Stables with good access to horse walks. | ||
WS205 | Newmarket | South Drive, Exning Road | The site has planning approval and development has commenced. | ||
WS1055 | Nowton | land next to Nowton Lodge | The site is considered an unsustainable location – small rural settlement with few or no services. Settlement has no boundary, and no sites will be allocated through the local plan. | ||
WS151 | Pakenham | land at Pakenham Lodge | The site is considered an unsustainable location – detached from settlement of Pakenham and poor connectivity. | ||
WS152 | Pakenham | The Depot, Fen Road | Site is currently occupied and considered to be more suitable to continue in its existing employment use. | ||
WS153 | Pakenham | land at Manor Farmhouse, Upper Town | The site is considered an unsustainable location – detached from settlement of Pakenham and poor connectivity. | ||
WS1056 | Pakenham | land west of Mill Road, Grimestone End | The site is considered an unsustainable location – detached from settlement of Pakenham and poor connectivity. | ||
WS1057 | Pakenham | Mill Road (east) | The site is below the minimum threshold for a proposed site allocation. | ||
WS154 | Red Lodge | land south of The Carrops | The site is considered an unsustainable location – poor relationship with settlement boundary and visually sensitive entrance to Red Lodge. | ||
WS156 | Red Lodge | The 'Gateway site', Kings Warren | The site has planning approval and development has commenced. | ||
WS157 | SA9d | Red Lodge | Land east of Newmarket Road | The site has a local plan allocation, planning approval and development has commenced. | |
WS207 | SA9c | Red Lodge | Land East of Larch Way, Red Lodge (Yellow Land) | The site has a local plan allocation, planning approval and development has commenced. The site is within the Breckland Special Protection Area buffer which is likely to impact the deliverability of the site. | |
WS459(A) | Risby | School Road | Site within Breckland Special Protection Area and/or associated buffer. | ||
RV23a | Risby | Land adjacent to the cricket pitch | The site has a local plan allocation, planning approval and development is complete. | ||
WS1059 | Risby | land west of Hall Lane | Site within Breckland Special Protection Area and/or associated buffer. | ||
WS1060 | Risby | land north of School Road | Site within Breckland Special Protection Area and/or associated buffer. | ||
WS1061 | Risby | land east of Hall Lane | Site within Breckland Special Protection Area and/or associated buffer. | ||
WS1064 | Stanningfield | land north of Chapel Road | Stanningfield settlement is designated as a type B village in the settlement hierarchy and has only a limited range of services and facilities. In type B villages there are no site allocations and only small-scale infill development of five homes or less within the designated housing settlement boundary will be permitted. | ||
WS169 | Stanton | land off Old Barningham Road (part of Duke Street Nursery) | The site is considered an unsustainable location – the site is separated from the main facilities and services in the village by the A143. An alternative site is considered to be a more suitable and sustainable option. | ||
WS170(A) | Stanton | land west of Duke Street | The site is considered an unsustainable location – the site is separated from the main facilities and services in the village by the A143. An alternative site is considered to be a more suitable and sustainable option. | ||
WS171 | Stanton | land between Bury Lane and Wyken Road | Landscape impact – key protected views to the south of the site, with a substantial woodland belt to the south. Poor access to the site from north and south. An alternative site is considered to be a more suitable and sustainable option. | ||
WS172 | Stanton | land at Little Hill Farm, Barningham Road | The site is considered an unsustainable location – the site is separated from the main facilities and services in the village by the A143. An alternative site is considered to be a more suitable and sustainable option. | ||
WS173 | Stanton | Little Farmhouse, Barningham Road | The site is considered an unsustainable location – the site is separated from the main facilities and services in the village by the A143. An alternative site is considered to be a more suitable and sustainable option. | ||
WS467 | RV4j | Stanton | land at Shepherds Grove | Site has not been confirmed as available and/or deliverable. The site is considered to be an unsustainable location – not well located to services and facilities in Stanton. An alternative site is considered to be a more suitable and sustainable option. | |
RV14a | Stanton | land at Upthorpe Road | The site has a local plan allocation, planning approval and development is complete. | ||
WS1065 | Stanton and Shepherds Grove | land south of Grove Lane | Site has not been confirmed as available and/or deliverable. The site is considered to be an unsustainable location – not well located to services and facilities in Stanton. An alternative site is considered to be a more suitable and sustainable option. | ||
WS174 | Stoke by Clare | land at Ashen Lane | The site is considered an unsustainable location – poor access and does not relate well to settlement. Potential impact to character and appearance of the village, as site forms part of the key entrance to the village. | ||
WS209 | Stoke by Clare | land adjacent to Little Paddocks | The site is considered an unsustainable location – poor access. Potential impact on character and/or appearance of conservation area. | ||
WS1066 | Stoke by Clare | Equestrian Centre, Green Farm | The site and/or development would be an inappropriate form of backland development. Potential impact on character and/or appearance of conservation area. | ||
WS1067 | Stradishall | Gooseacre Field | Stradishall settlement is designated as a type B village in the settlement hierarchy and has only a limited range of services and facilities. In type B villages there are no site allocations and only small-scale infill development of five homes or less within the designated housing settlement boundary will be permitted. | ||
WS1068 | Stradishall | land to the south-east of The Street | Stradishall settlement is designated as a type B village in the settlement hierarchy and has only a limited range of services and facilities. In type B villages there are no site allocations and only small-scale infill development of five homes or less within the designated housing settlement boundary will be permitted. | ||
WS1069 | Stradishall | land at Edmunds Hill | Stradishall settlement is designated as a type B village in the settlement hierarchy and has only a limited range of services and facilities. In type B villages there are no site allocations and only small-scale infill development of five homes or less within the designated housing settlement boundary will be permitted. | ||
WS175 | WS1066 | Troston | land west of The Street (also known as Lower Farm Piggery) | Troston settlement is designated as a type B village in the settlement hierarchy and has only a limited range of services and facilities. In type B villages there are no site allocations and only small-scale infill development of five homes or less within the designated housing settlement boundary will be permitted. | |
WS176 | Troston | land at Livermere Road | Troston settlement is designated as a type B village in the settlement hierarchy and has only a limited range of services and facilities. In type B villages there are no site allocations and only small-scale infill development of five homes or less within the designated housing settlement boundary will be permitted. | ||
WS1070 | Tuddenham | land adjacent to 29 Cavenham Road | Site within Breckland Special Protection Area Stone Curlew buffer. | ||
WS177 | West Row | land at Pott Hall Road | Given the proximity and relationship between West Row and Mildenhall, growth in West Row needs to be considered in conjunction with growth in Mildenhall. West Row has seen significant windfall growth in recent years and the existing allocation which has not yet come forward is considered to provide an appropriate scale of growth for West Row, a local service centre, in accordance with the preferred distribution of growth strategy. No further allocations are needed to be identified in West Row in this plan period. | ||
WS178 | West Row | land at Williams Way | Given the proximity and relationship between West Row and Mildenhall, growth in West Row needs to be considered in conjunction with growth in Mildenhall. West Row has seen significant windfall growth in recent years and the existing allocation which has not yet come forward is considered to provide an appropriate scale of growth for West Row, a local service centre, in accordance with the preferred distribution of growth strategy. No further allocations are needed to be identified in West Row in this plan period. | ||
WS180 | West Row | land south of Chapel Street | Given the proximity and relationship between West Row and Mildenhall, growth in West Row needs to be considered in conjunction with growth in Mildenhall. West Row has seen significant windfall growth in recent years and the existing allocation which has not yet come forward is considered to provide an appropriate scale of growth for West Row, a local service centre, in accordance with the preferred distribution of growth strategy. No further allocations are needed to be identified in West Row in this plan period. | ||
WS182 | West Row | land off Pott Hall Road | Given the proximity and relationship between West Row and Mildenhall, growth in West Row needs to be considered in conjunction with growth in Mildenhall. West Row has seen significant windfall growth in recent years and the existing allocation which has not yet come forward is considered to provide an appropriate scale of growth for West Row, a local service centre, in accordance with the preferred distribution of growth strategy. No further allocations are needed to be identified in West Row in this plan period. | ||
WS183 | West Row | land at junction of Jarman's Lane and Beeches Road | Given the proximity and relationship between West Row and Mildenhall, growth in West Row needs to be considered in conjunction with growth in Mildenhall. West Row has seen significant windfall growth in recent years and the existing allocation which has not yet come forward is considered to provide an appropriate scale of growth for West Row, a local service centre, in accordance with the preferred distribution of growth strategy. No further allocations are needed to be identified in West Row in this plan period. | ||
WS184 | West Row | land off Chapel Road | Given the proximity and relationship between West Row and Mildenhall, growth in West Row needs to be considered in conjunction with growth in Mildenhall. West Row has seen significant windfall growth in recent years and the existing allocation which has not yet come forward is considered to provide an appropriate scale of growth for West Row, a local service centre, in accordance with the preferred distribution of growth strategy. No further allocations are needed to be identified in West Row in this plan period. | ||
WS185 | West Row | land north of Ferry Lane | Given the proximity and relationship between West Row and Mildenhall, growth in West Row needs to be considered in conjunction with growth in Mildenhall. West Row has seen significant windfall growth in recent years and the existing allocation which has not yet come forward is considered to provide an appropriate scale of growth for West Row, a local service centre, in accordance with the preferred distribution of growth strategy. No further allocations are needed to be identified in West Row in this plan period. | ||
WS186 | West Row | lane to rear of 82/84 Church Road | Given the proximity and relationship between West Row and Mildenhall, growth in West Row needs to be considered in conjunction with growth in Mildenhall. West Row has seen significant windfall growth in recent years and the existing allocation which has not yet come forward is considered to provide an appropriate scale of growth for West Row, a local service centre, in accordance with the preferred distribution of growth strategy. No further allocations are needed to be identified in West Row in this plan period. | ||
WS187 | West Row | land off Parkers Drive | Given the proximity and relationship between West Row and Mildenhall, growth in West Row needs to be considered in conjunction with growth in Mildenhall. West Row has seen significant windfall growth in recent years and the existing allocation which has not yet come forward is considered to provide an appropriate scale of growth for West Row, a local service centre, in accordance with the preferred distribution of growth strategy. No further allocations are needed to be identified in West Row in this plan period. | ||
WS188 | West Row | land off West Row Road | Given the proximity and relationship between West Row and Mildenhall, growth in West Row needs to be considered in conjunction with growth in Mildenhall. West Row has seen significant windfall growth in recent years and the existing allocation which has not yet come forward is considered to provide an appropriate scale of growth for West Row, a local service centre, in accordance with the preferred distribution of growth strategy. No further allocations are needed to be identified in West Row in this plan period. | ||
WS210 | West Row | Site B land to the east of The Forge | Given the proximity and relationship between West Row and Mildenhall, growth in West Row needs to be considered in conjunction with growth in Mildenhall. West Row has seen significant windfall growth in recent years and the existing allocation which has not yet come forward is considered to provide an appropriate scale of growth for West Row, a local service centre, in accordance with the preferred distribution of growth strategy. No further allocations are needed to be identified in West Row in this plan period. | ||
WS635 | West Row | land off Manor Farm Road | Given the proximity and relationship between West Row and Mildenhall, growth in West Row needs to be considered in conjunction with growth in Mildenhall. West Row has seen significant windfall growth in recent years and the existing allocation which has not yet come forward is considered to provide an appropriate scale of growth for West Row, a local service centre, in accordance with the preferred distribution of growth strategy. No further allocations are needed to be identified in West Row in this plan period. | ||
WS637 | West Row | land adjacent to Park Garden, Friday Street | Given the proximity and relationship between West Row and Mildenhall, growth in West Row needs to be considered in conjunction with growth in Mildenhall. West Row has seen significant windfall growth in recent years and the existing allocation which has not yet come forward is considered to provide an appropriate scale of growth for West Row, a local service centre, in accordance with the preferred distribution of growth strategy. No further allocations are needed to be identified in West Row in this plan period. | ||
WS1072 | Westley | land east of Hill Road and north of Westley Road | The site is considered an unsustainable location – small rural settlement with few or no services. Settlement has no boundary, and no sites will be allocated through the local plan. | ||
WS1073 | Whepstead | land east of Old School Road | Whepstead settlement is designated as a type B village in the settlement hierarchy and has only a limited range of services and facilities. In type B villages there are no site allocations and only small-scale infill development of five homes or less within the designated housing settlement boundary will be permitted. | ||
WS190 | Wickhambrook | land south of Bunters Road | Landscape impact – considered to be important open space at southern entrance to village. Potential impact to character and appearance of the village. An alternative site is considered to be a more suitable and sustainable option. | ||
WS191 | Wickhambrook | north and west of Boyden End (also known as north of Nunnery Green | Potential impact to character and appearance of the village. An alternative site is considered to be a more suitable and sustainable option. | ||
WS192(A) | Wickhambrook | land north of Bunters Road | Potential impact to character and appearance of the village. An alternative site is considered to be a more suitable and sustainable option. | ||
WS212 | Wickhambrook | land at Cemetery Hill | Landscape impact – large open field, highly visible on entrance to the village from the north. An alternative site is considered to be a more suitable and sustainable option. | ||
WS1074 | Wickhambrook | land adjacent Bunters Gait, Nunnery Green | The site is considered an unsustainable location due to its distance and/or proximity to existing services and facilities. An alternative site is considered to be a more suitable and sustainable option. | ||
WS193 | RV25a | Wickhambrook | Land at Nunnery Green and Cemetery Hill, Wickhambrook | The site has a local plan allocation, a planning approval and development is nearing completion. | |
WS196 | Worlington | land north of Freckenham Road | Worlington settlement is designated as a type B village in the settlement hierarchy and has only limited range of services and facilities. In type B villages there are no site allocations and only small-scale infill development of five homes or less within the designated housing settlement boundary will be permitted. | ||
WS197 | Worlington | land north of Manor Farm | Worlington settlement is designated as a type B village in the settlement hierarchy and has only limited range of services and facilities. In type B villages there are no site allocations and only small-scale infill development of five homes or less within the designated housing settlement boundary will be permitted. | ||
WS198 | Worlington | land north of The Street (up to cricket ground) | Worlington settlement is designated as a type B village in the settlement hierarchy and has only limited range of services and facilities. In type B villages there are no site allocations and only small-scale infill development of five homes or less within the designated housing settlement boundary will be permitted. |
Employment omission sites
Strategic housing and economic land availability assessment (SHELAA) reference consulted at issues and options (ending in (A) shows amended boundary at issues and options) | 2021 SHELAA ref (new sites submitted at issues and options) | Vision or site allocations local plan allocation reference | Settlement | Location | Reason for omission |
WSE05(A) | Barton Mills | Land at Barton Mills | Evidence demonstrates that additional allocations should focus on Bury St Edmunds where there is strongest demand, and then the other towns, with the exception of Brandon due to its environmental constraints and a small amount of rural provision. The site is considered an unsustainable location for rural employment growth. | ||
BV11 | Bury St Edmunds | Land at Ram Meadow | The site is within the settlement boundary and could come forward as windfall development. | ||
WSE012(A) | Bury St Edmunds | Honey Hill, West of Bury St Edmunds | Landscape constraints and adverse impact on gateway approach to Bury St Edmunds due to open nature of the site. | ||
WSE1011 | Bury St Edmunds | Land to the east of the waste hub | Evidence demonstrates that additional allocations should focus on Bury St Edmunds where there is strongest demand, and then the other towns, with the exception of Brandon due to its environmental constraints and a small amount of rural provision. The site is considered an unsustainable location for rural employment growth. The site is considered an unsustainable location – poorly relates settlement. Potential landscape impacts due to openness of countryside. | ||
WSE1014 | Bury St Edmunds | Former waste recycling centre, Rougham Hill | The existing designation as countryside remains appropriate, as it poorly relates to the existing settlement. Connectivity issues and lies more than 300 metres outside the town centre boundary. | ||
WSE08 | Fornham St Martin | Land north of B1106, Park Farm, Fornham St Genevieve (part of SS093 Park Farm Quarry) | The site is open countryside and poorly relates to existing employment area. Site WSE02 is considered to be a more suitable and sustainable option as it is better related to the existing Park Farm rural employment site, is served by an existing access and has a landscaped edge. | ||
WSE09 | Fornham St Martin | Land north-east of Park Farm Business Centre | The site is open countryside and poorly relates to existing employment area. Site WSE02 is considered to be a more suitable and sustainable option as it is better related to the existing Park Farm rural employment site, is served by an existing access and has a landscaped edge. | ||
WSE25 | RV6 | Fornham St Martin | Park Farm Quarry | The site has a local plan allocation, planning approval and development has commenced on site. | |
WSE1030 | Haverhill | Opposite research part west | Landscape impact, open countryside in an unsustainable location and adverse impact on gateway approach to Haverhill. | ||
WSE1035 | Higham | Land between Higham Lane and Coalpit Lane, Lower Green | Evidence demonstrates that additional allocations should focus on Bury St Edmunds where there is strongest demand, and then the other towns, with the exception of Brandon due to its environmental constraints and a small amount of rural provision. The site is considered an unsustainable location for rural employment growth. | ||
RV4g | Ixworth | land off Bardwell Road | The site is incorporated within a wider mixed-use allocation reference 3.03a. | ||
WSE01 | Ixworth | Manor Farm, Ixworth Thorpe | The site is considered an unsustainable location. The Ixworth neighbourhood plan is under preparation and is proposing an alternative and more suitably located employment area. | ||
WSE1044 | Kennett | Railway sidings | Evidence demonstrates that additional allocations should focus on Bury St Edmunds where there is strongest demand, and then the other towns, with the exception of Brandon due to its environmental constraints and a small amount of rural provision. The site is considered an unsustainable location for rural employment growth. | ||
WS1049 | Little Wratting | Karro Foods Site | Evidence demonstrates that additional allocations should focus on Bury St Edmunds where there is strongest demand, and then the other towns, with the exception of Brandon due to its environmental constraints and a small amount of rural provision. Landscape impact, need to retain strategic gap between Little Wratting and Kedington, loss of open space to be addressed, rural location, impact on highway and/or rural roads means this site is unsuitable for allocation. | ||
SA16l | Mildenhall | Extension to industrial estate to incorporate planning permission under construction | Site has been combined with former allocation SA16(k) to form policy 2.04d. | ||
WSE15 | Newmarket | Land south of Barbara Stradbroke Avenue | Potential impacts on scheduled ancient monument to the south-west of the site. Potential impacts on site of special scientific interest and special area of conservation to the north-west of the site. The site is partly in West Suffolk and could come forward as windfall development if constraints and impacts are adequately addressed. | ||
SA17b | Newmarket | St Leger | Site has been combined with former allocation SA16(m) to form policy 2.05f. | ||
SA18a | Newmarket | Former gas works, Exning Road | The site has a local plan allocation, planning approval and development is complete. | ||
WSE04 | Red Lodge | Land east of Elms Road and A11 northbound exit slip road to Red Lodge | The site is considered an unsustainable location. The employment land review study does not support this scale of economic growth and directs strategic allocations to be identified in the towns first. | ||
WSE06 | Saxham | Saxham Business Park extension to the west | Site within Breckland Special Protection Area and/or associated buffer. | ||
WSE1081 | Stoke by Clare | Land east of Ashen Lane | Evidence demonstrates that additional allocations should focus on Bury St Edmunds where there is strongest demand, and then the other towns, with the exception of Brandon due to its environmental constraints and a small amount of rural provision. The site is considered an unsustainable location for rural employment growth. | ||
WSE14 | Whepstead | Land at Chedburgh Road | Evidence demonstrates that additional allocations should focus on Bury St Edmunds where there is strongest demand, and then the other towns, with the exception of Brandon due to its environmental constraints and a small amount of rural provision. The site is considered an unsustainable location for rural employment growth. | ||
WSE1075 | Wickhambrook | Land north of Claydon Drills, Bunters Road | Evidence demonstrates that additional allocations should focus on Bury St Edmunds where there is strongest demand, and then the other towns, with the exception of Brandon due to its environmental constraints and a small amount of rural provision. The site is considered an unsustainable location for rural employment growth. | ||
WSE1076 | Withersfield | Land opposite Hanchett House | Landscape impact, open countryside in an unsustainable location and adverse impact on gateway approach to Haverhill. |
Skip to actions